The Bombay High Court has issued a strong administrative direction to judicial officers in Maharashtra and Goa, making it clear that every order and judgement must be uploaded on the CIS server on the very day it is pronounced. The move aims to improve court discipline and public access to judicial records.
The direction has been circulated to all judicial officers through the Principal District and Sessions Judges. These senior officers have been told to inform all officers under their control and make sure the instructions are followed without fail.
The High Court has also said that if any order or judgement is not uploaded on the same day, the concerned judicial officer must give full details and explain the reason for the delay. This makes timely uploading not just an administrative step, but a mandatory responsibility.
In one of the strongest parts of the circular, the High Court stated that failure to upload orders or judgements within the fixed timeline will amount to “misconduct touching to the integrity of judicial officer”. This shows that the court is treating delays as a serious issue linked to judicial accountability.
Judicial officers have further been directed to submit a monthly certificate in a prescribed format. Through this certificate, they must confirm that all orders and judgements were uploaded within the required time. The monthly reporting system appears to be aimed at regular monitoring and better institutional control.
The circular goes even further by warning that if any discrepancy is found in the information given in the monthly certificate, the officer concerned may be placed under suspension, and departmental enquiry may be dispensed with. This underlines the strict consequences for giving incorrect information.
Apart from uploading directions, the High Court has also told judicial officers not to keep court files with them after disposal of a case. This part of the circular appears to focus on proper record management and prevention of irregular practices after matters are concluded.
These fresh instructions come from concerns that had already been raised in an earlier communication dated January 9, 2020. That communication was based on inspections of subordinate courts and had pointed to several troubling issues in court functioning.
During inspections, the Registrar had noticed irregularities such as late sitting beyond 11 am, early departure before court hours ended, delayed uploading of judgements, long periods of reserved judgements, failure to record evidence when matters were fixed, and leaving headquarters without prior permission.
By reiterating these directions in clear terms, the Bombay High Court has sent a firm message that discipline, transparency, and timely judicial work are not optional. The circular reflects an effort to strengthen court administration and ensure that judicial officers follow proper standards in daily functioning.
——————————————–
Have a case update, article, or deal to share? Courtroom Today welcomes contributions from lawyers, law firms, and legal professionals. Write to contact@courtroomtoday.com





